Skip to content
Lake and pond expertiseSoftware, monitoring, and consulting
Learning CenterField methods chapterDesign Aquatic Invasive Animal Early-Detection Surveillance and Verification
Evidence method · Aquatic invasive animals

Design Aquatic Invasive Animal Early-Detection Surveillance and Verification

Design risk-informed, multi-method surveillance for non-plant aquatic animals while preserving method, life-stage, effort, biosecurity, taxonomic, laboratory, eDNA, and inference limits.

For
Aquatic ecologists, fisheries and invertebrate biologists, AIS coordinators, Tribes, agencies, utilities, consultants, laboratories, and qualified monitoring teams
Reading time
32 minutes
Reviewed
Next review
Direct answer

What to do first

Begin with the decision, target taxon or taxonomic group, life stage, geography, season, detection unit, and inference the program needs. Resolve authority, access, safety, animal welfare, protected resources, specimen handling, waste, and between-site biosecurity before selecting gear. Use documented pathway and habitat evidence to allocate sites, timing, methods, replication, and effort; do not assume one method detects every fish, mollusk, crustacean, or other aquatic invertebrate. Combine appropriate visual, specimen, settlement-substrate, plankton or veliger, conventional capture, and eDNA evidence when the decision warrants it. Preserve blanks, controls, contamination events, inhibition, assay and laboratory validation, taxonomy, custody, and result qualifiers. An eDNA positive detects genetic material, not necessarily a live organism or population; a non-detect is bounded by design, method, effort, timing, life stage, and detection probability and does not prove absence. Separate report, analytical detection, taxonomic identification, verified occurrence, establishment, invasive status, and response trigger. Predefine authority-led verification and communication states, protect sensitive data, and adapt surveillance without rewriting the original evidence.

Use this guide to
  • Define the surveillance decision, taxon, life stage, detection unit, and inference
  • Allocate sites and effort using documented pathway and habitat risk
  • Use complementary methods without treating them as interchangeable
  • Control biosecurity, custody, taxonomy, laboratory, and eDNA quality
  • Interpret positives and non-detects within design and detection limits
  • Predefine authority-led verification, response, release, and adaptation states

1. Define the decision, taxon, life stage, and watchlist

Surveillance must name what it can detect and what decision the evidence can inform.

Record the decision owner, jurisdiction, target taxon or group, non-target taxa, life stages, pathway, waterbody boundary, reporting threshold, verification owner, response horizon, and current official watchlist or status source. Native range and invasive status are geographic and time-bounded; being native somewhere does not make a taxon native here.

Sources: [1], [5], [11]

2. Resolve authority, permits, safety, and biosecurity

A scientifically interesting method is unusable when the activity is unsafe, unlawful, or spreads organisms.

Freeze access, collection, possession, transport, release, animal-welfare, protected-resource, boating, diving, electrical, chemical, laboratory, waste, and reporting controls. Apply an approved Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point or equivalent pathway-focused biosecurity plan. Define clean and dirty zones, between-site sequence, equipment compatibility, wastewater and residual handling, evidence, exceptions, and clearance owner.

Sources: [3], [12]

3. Define the target population, detection unit, and inference

A detection unit and a population are not interchangeable.

Define the target population, spatial frame, primary unit, subsample, sample volume or area, visit, season, life stage, observable response, and result state. State whether the design supports pathway screening, occupancy evidence, delimitation, relative distribution, method comparison, or trend. A sample result alone does not estimate abundance, reproduction, establishment, or eradication.

Sources: [1], [6]

4. Select sites with documented pathway and habitat evidence

Risk-informed allocation must remain reproducible and must not erase the rest of the frame.

Preserve waterbody connections, launches, marinas, docks, bait and aquaculture pathways, outfalls, tributaries, currents, substrate, depth, temperature, chemistry, habitat, infrastructure, prior records, access, and sampling history. Record source versions and the rule that converted evidence into site strata. Risk maps prioritize effort; they do not prove invasion or justify declaring unsampled areas free of the taxon.

Sources: [3], [5], [10]

5. Set effort, season, replication, and detection objectives

Detection depends on abundance, life stage, habitat, time, method, and effort.

Predefine site and visit counts, timing windows, sample volume or area, gear effort, replicate and repeat-visit structure, quality-control allocation, and rules for inaccessible or invalid units. Where detection probability is estimated, preserve model, assumptions, covariates, uncertainty, and applicability. One season without detection does not demonstrate eradication or long-term control.

Sources: [1], [12]

6. Match complementary methods to taxon and life stage

No single gear, sample, or assay observes every aquatic animal or life stage.

Method families and limits
Method familyPotential evidenceKey boundary
Visual, image, shell, or specimenMorphology at an observed place and timeDetectability and identification expertise
Settlement substrate or fouling inspectionAttachment or colonization during deploymentTaxon, substrate, depth, and exposure window
Plankton or veliger samplingFree-living larval stagesSeason, flow, volume, concentration, microscopy
Nets, traps, electrofishing, or other captureGear-selective animalsAuthority, safety, welfare, habitat, and selectivity
eDNATarget genetic material in a sampleTransport, persistence, contamination, inhibition, and assay specificity

Sources: [12], [8]

7. Govern visual, specimen, and settlement-substrate evidence

Observation support, exposure interval, custody, and taxonomic confidence must remain linked.

For each observation or substrate, retain exact location, depth, date, effort or exposure interval, material and surface, environmental context, photographs, scale, observer, provisional identification, confidence, voucher decision, custody, expert determination, and disposition. Old shells, fragments, attached organisms, and fresh living specimens are different evidence states.

Sources: [12], [5]

8. Control plankton, veliger, and microscopy evidence

Larval surveillance requires controlled volume, concentration, microscopy, and confirmation.

Follow the approved protocol for sample location, depth, water volume, mesh or concentration method, replicate, preservation, holding, custody, microscope preparation, analyst qualification, morphology, measurement, image, quality controls, second review, and result category. A suspected veliger or image is not an authority-confirmed species occurrence.

Sources: [12]

9. Use fish and invertebrate field methods through qualified teams

Capture methods require method-specific competence, authority, welfare, and safety systems.

Use an approved design and trained, authorized teams for nets, traps, benthic gear, electrofishing, imaging, diving, or other capture. Retain gear, dimensions, settings, deployment, habitat, duration, catch, bycatch, injury or mortality, identification, disposition, failures, and effort. Never improvise retention, release, euthanasia, stocking, translocation, chemical use, or protected-species handling from this guide.

Sources: [1], [4], [5]

10. Control eDNA sampling and contamination

Molecular sensitivity requires visible control of every contamination and transfer pathway.

Freeze target, matrix, location, depth, volume, replicate, filtration or preservation, field and equipment blanks, positive controls where appropriate, clean workflow, equipment lot, storage, shipping, custody, holding, extraction, inhibition, amplification, assay, threshold, laboratory, and deviations. Separate field, laboratory, assay, and data-quality controls; do not silently delete a contamination event.

Sources: [8], [9], [12]

11. Preserve laboratory, taxonomy, assay, and validation lineage

A result needs traceable identity, method, controls, reviewer, and fitness for use.

Retain sample and extract IDs, receipt and condition, chain of custody, laboratory and analyst, taxonomic keys or reference collections, assay target and version, primers and probes, specificity and sensitivity evidence, controls, replicate rules, inhibition assessment, sequence or confirmation where used, qualifiers, amendments, and reviewer. Method validation and taxonomic determination are distinct.

Sources: [9], [12]

12. Interpret positives and non-detects conservatively

A laboratory or field result is bounded by the complete observation process.

Report the method-specific result, controls, quantification or threshold where applicable, qualifiers, contamination, inhibition, false-positive and false-negative pathways, sampled frame, effort, timing, and detection limits. An eDNA positive identifies target genetic material rather than a live organism or population. A non-detect means not detected under the stated design; it does not prove absence.

Sources: [8], [7]

13. Predefine verification and response-trigger states

Escalation rules route evidence to authority; they do not grant response authority.

Define who reviews suspect observations, specimens, morphology, microscopy, molecular results, conflicts, repeat sampling, independent confirmation, occurrence records, establishment evidence, and status. Keep report, detection, provisional identification, taxonomic confirmation, verified occurrence, establishment, regulatory status, response eligibility, response authorization, and public release separately dated and attributable.

Sources: [1], [2], [6]

14. Submit controlled data, release carefully, and adapt

Surveillance improves through versioned evidence, not retrospective redesign.

Submit suitable records and eDNA datasets through current official channels with required metadata. Protect exact sensitive locations, private information, infrastructure, and response operations. Publish method, effort, result state, confidence, limitations, reviewer, date, and correction route. Revise future site allocation, timing, methods, and effort after reviewed evidence while preserving the original plan and deviations.

Sources: [5], [9], [1]

Evidence base

Sources and review notes

Educational aquatic-invasive-species prevention, surveillance, reporting, and program-planning guidance only. This material is not a species identification, occurrence verification, establishment finding, invasive or injurious status determination, watercraft clearance, decontamination protocol, permit, pesticide label, incident command, eradication decision, treatment recommendation, legal opinion, or authorization. Current federal, Tribal, state, territorial, local, landowner, laboratory, taxonomic, safety, animal-welfare, protected-resource, pesticide, discharge, transport, possession, reporting, inspection, decontamination, and public-communication requirements control.

  1. Early Detection Rapid ResponseU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · agency guidance
  2. Guidelines for the Development of an Aquatic Invasive Species Rapid Response PlanU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · reference
  3. Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force: PreventionU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · agency guidance
  4. Injurious WildlifeU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · reference
  5. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database and WebsiteU.S. Geological Survey · reference
  6. NAS Database CharacterizationU.S. Geological Survey · reference
  7. NAS Database Queries and Data DisclaimerU.S. Geological Survey · reference
  8. Environmental DNA in the NAS DatabaseU.S. Geological Survey · reference
  9. Guidance for Submitting Environmental DNA Data to the NAS DatabaseU.S. Geological Survey · field protocol
  10. Great Lakes Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Information SystemNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · reference
  11. GLANSIS Inclusion and Classification CriteriaNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · reference
  12. Invasive Mussels: Guidance and ProceduresBureau of Reclamation · field protocol