Shoreline and Littoral Habitat Assessment
A defensible lake and reservoir field guide for observing shoreline, riparian, bank, drawdown, and littoral habitat while preserving water-level context, repeatability, sensitive-resource controls, and the boundary between evidence and management authority.
What to do first
Begin with a named decision and sampling frame, then adopt one controlled method for shoreline, riparian, bank, drawdown, and littoral boundaries at a stated water level and datum. Select reaches or plots independently of visible condition, record actual access and effort, and keep raw observations of land use, alteration, vegetation, substrate, woody material, fish-cover features, erosion indicators, depth, light, and connectivity separate from derived metrics. A condition score requires a documented calculation and reference comparison; an impairment or regulatory finding, causal diagnosis, restoration eligibility decision, authorization, implementation plan, and effectiveness conclusion each require additional evidence and the responsible authority. No single field score authorizes restoration, stocking, shoreline work, or enforcement.
- Define a repeatable shoreline, riparian, bank, drawdown, and littoral survey frame tied to water level and datum.
- Distinguish raw habitat observations from metrics, reference comparisons, impairment findings, causal claims, and management authority.
- Record shoreline alteration, land use, erosion indicators, substrate, woody material, vegetation, fish-cover features, depth, light, and connectivity without overinterpreting them.
- Preserve photo, GPS, GIS, remote-sensing, access, non-detection, and quality-control evidence from field unit to released map.
- Protect landowner, Tribal, protected-resource, safety, privacy, and sensitive-location boundaries before fieldwork or publication.
Field route
Use an authored handoff; this is not an automatic recommendation or approval.
Open Shoreline and fish-habitat record Use the governed record after reviewing Shoreline and Littoral Habitat Assessment.
Keep every evidence-to-action boundary explicit
A shoreline observation can support a metric, but each later conclusion requires its own method, comparison, evidence, and accountable authority.
Write the intended decision and evidence use before mobilization. A baseline inventory, status estimate, trend survey, erosion screening, protected-resource reconnaissance, habitat-restoration feasibility study, regulatory assessment, and effectiveness evaluation are different projects. They may share field observations, but they do not share automatic conclusions.
Preserve the transitions below as separate records. A reviewer should be able to stop at any stage, inspect the supporting evidence, and see who had authority to advance it. If the project is only authorized to observe, leave later stages visibly unresolved rather than filling them with field opinion.
| Stage | Required record | Boundary that remains |
|---|---|---|
| Observation | What was directly seen, measured, photographed, probed, or mapped in the defined unit, with method and conditions. | Does not establish condition, cause, legal status, or a remedy. |
| Condition metric | Versioned calculation from eligible observations, denominators, weights, and missing-data rules. | Does not become good, fair, poor, impaired, or restorable without a comparison framework. |
| Reference comparison | Comparison to an applicable regional, lake-type, historical, or project reference with uncertainty. | Association or departure does not establish regulatory impairment or cause. |
| Impairment or regulatory finding | Applicable standard, program method, jurisdiction, evidence package, and authorized decision. | A national survey indicator or local screening score is not automatically a regulatory finding. |
| Cause | Competing hypotheses tested with hydrology, exposure, chronology, process, source, and alternative-cause evidence. | Co-occurrence of alteration, erosion, fish cover, or biology does not prove mechanism. |
| Restoration eligibility | Program criteria, ownership, feasibility, protected-resource constraints, benefits, risks, and responsible determination. | Eligibility is not a permit, design approval, funding award, or evidence of likely success. |
| Authorization | Landowner, Tribal, local, state, and federal permissions and consultation outcomes for the exact action and footprint. | A survey, concept map, grant, or recommendation is not construction or stocking authority. |
| Implementation | Approved design, methods, contractor controls, timing, safety, inspection, as-built record, and change control. | Completion does not establish ecological effectiveness. |
| Effectiveness | Predeclared endpoints, baseline and comparison, repeat method, adverse outcomes, confounders, uncertainty, and review. | A favorable photo or one post-project score cannot establish durable success. |
Define the objective, target population, and survey frame
The frame determines which shoreline and littoral units had a chance to be observed and therefore what the resulting estimate can represent.
Name the target population: the whole main shoreline, selected reservoir arms, islands, connected wetlands, public parcels, management reaches, developed and comparison shores, fish-cover zones, erosion concerns, or another explicit extent. State what is excluded, including tributary channels, backwaters, marinas, inaccessible private coves, islands, dam or intake security zones, or disconnected waters. A frame chosen around complaints or proposed projects is targeted, not lake-wide representative.
Choose a census, probability sample, systematic sample with randomized origin, stratified design, permanent reaches, rotating panel, parcel inventory, or targeted reconnaissance because it supports the objective. Preserve the shoreline source, frame date, water level, coordinate reference system, islands and inlet rules, reach segmentation, strata, selection code, replacements, and intended estimator. Do not choose unit length, spacing, plot width, or sample count from an unrelated protocol merely because it is convenient.
Define the observational unit and reporting unit separately. A photo, shoreline segment, riparian plot, bank face, littoral plot, woody-habitat item, fish-cover observation, parcel, and whole-lake metric are not interchangeable replicates. State whether inference applies to sampled units, a stratum, the mapped shoreline, or a broader population and how weighting supports that inference.
- Decision, target population, exclusions, observation unit, reporting unit, and inference extent are written.
- Frame source, shoreline date, islands and connected-water rules, coordinate system, and water level are versioned.
- Selection is census, probability, systematic, stratified, permanent, rotating, parcel-based, or targeted by explicit design.
- Unit dimensions, spacing, effort, replacement rules, weighting, precision objective, and missing-data treatment come from the approved plan.
- Sensitive or restricted locations are identified in a controlled layer before distributing field maps.
Operationally define shoreline, riparian, bank, drawdown, and littoral zones
Zone boundaries move or overlap with stage, slope, vegetation, and program definitions; record the operational boundary without claiming a legal water-line determination.
Adopt the exact terms in the approved protocol. The current water's edge, operational shoreline, bank toe and top, drawdown or exposed bed, high-water indicator, riparian plot, shore band, and littoral plot answer different questions. On gradual, wetland-fringed, flooded, drawdown, armored, or steep shores, the zones may be hard to see or may overlap. Record how each boundary was located and the uncertainty.
Tie field geometry to a named water-level record and vertical datum when possible. Preserve observation time, present stage or water-surface elevation, gauge and datum, relation to the protocol's high-water reference, vertical and horizontal drawdown or flooding evidence, and any estimated rather than surveyed boundary. Photographs should include enough land-water context to interpret stage later.
Do not present a field approximation as an ordinary, normal, or mean high-water legal determination. Wisconsin's habitat protocol explicitly separates its field high-water concept from a legal ordinary high-water determination. Regulatory boundaries require the applicable jurisdiction and qualified authority.
| Zone or boundary | Field purpose | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Current water edge or operational shoreline | Locate the observed land-water interface for the visit and field layout. | Moves with stage, waves, wetlands, ice, and drawdown; not automatically a legal boundary. |
| Bank zone | Describe bank face, toe, top, slope, material, vegetation, modification, and erosion evidence. | May overlap riparian, exposed-bed, or flooded zones depending on morphology and stage. |
| Riparian zone or plot | Observe landward vegetation, ground cover, land use, runoff pathways, and structures within the method-defined extent. | A survey plot is not a universal buffer or setback recommendation. |
| Drawdown or exposed bed | Document substrate, vegetation, disturbance, access, and distance between current water and the adopted high-water reference. | One visit does not establish the frequency, duration, or cause of drawdown. |
| Littoral zone or plot | Observe shallow-water substrate, vegetation, woody material, rock, structures, and fish-cover features. | The plot extent is method-specific; ecological littoral extent also depends on light and suitable bottom. |
Locate reaches and plots without hiding missing or method-limited units
Field convenience must not replace selected units, and a feature that was not visible or not surveyed is not an observed absence.
Preload stable IDs and planned coordinates or boundaries. At each unit record planned and actual position, route direction, stationing or shoreline segment, observation platform and offset, date and time, water depth, stage context, visibility, weather, effort, observers, access, and any movement. If the method permits adjustment, retain both locations and the rule used; never shift toward an easy landing, visible erosion, woody cover, or developed parcel without marking the change.
Define unit states before fieldwork: completed, partially completed, valid non-detect for a named feature, obscured, method-limited, inaccessible, unsafe, dry or dewatered, outside the current frame, restricted, missing imagery, equipment failure, or not sampled. Preserve partial fields rather than converting the whole unit to zero. Dense vegetation, turbidity, glare, depth, docks, waves, private access, or submerged hazards can make some attributes unobservable while others remain valid.
Report non-detection as bounded by the feature, zone, unit, method, viewing conditions, season, and effort. A structure not seen from a boat is not proof it is absent on land; woody material not visible through turbid water is not a valid zero; no fish observed during a habitat survey says nothing reliable about fish absence unless a separate fisheries design supports it.
- Planned and actual unit geometry, movement, observer position, time, water level, visibility, and effort are retained.
- Completed, partial, valid non-detect, obscured, method-limited, inaccessible, unsafe, restricted, and not-sampled states are distinct.
- Feature-level observability is recorded instead of applying one blanket zero to the unit.
- Replacement and weighting follow the approved design and preserve the original selected unit.
- Spatial patterns of missingness are mapped and considered before lake-wide inference.
Record shoreline alteration and land use as observations
Describe what occupies the defined zones, how much of the unit it occupies under the method, and whether it lies inside or adjacent, without assigning violation, cause, or restoration priority in the field.
Use controlled categories for riparian canopy and understory, natural ground cover, lawn, agriculture, bare soil, impervious surface, buildings, roads, paths, camps, docks, marinas, walls, revetment, riprap, beaches, fill, retaining structures, pipes, drains, utilities, boats, and other human influence. Define whether the entry is presence, count, length, projected cover, intensity, or proximity and whether it falls inside the unit, adjacent, or only visible beyond it.
Document apparent runoff pathways such as connected impervious surfaces, gullies, drains, exposed soil, livestock access, concentrated flow, or eroding approaches. Record direct observations and photos; do not infer pollutant delivery, ownership, compliance, or source contribution without hydrologic, legal, and event evidence. Similarly, natural vegetation or an unarmored bank is not automatically stable, reference condition, or protected habitat.
Keep parcel and property information separate from ecological observations unless the authorized project requires linkage. Aerial parcel lines may be approximate, and observation from public water does not authorize entry, measurement on private land, photography into private spaces, or publication of personally identifying information.
| Field | Record | Do not infer |
|---|---|---|
| Feature identity | Controlled category, description, zone, inside/adjacent/outside status, and confidence. | Ownership, age, legality, function, or ecological effect from appearance alone. |
| Extent or intensity | Method-defined presence, count, shoreline length, projected cover, or ordinal category with unit and denominator. | Interchangeability among counts, cover, length, or a different protocol's score. |
| Runoff or disturbance evidence | Observed drain, flow path, rill, bare soil, deposition, plume, trampling, excavation, or maintenance condition. | Source contribution, violation, impairment, or causal mechanism without confirmation. |
| Spatial link | Reach ID, coordinates, photo and feature ID, current water level, and mapped source lineage. | Surveyed property boundary or permission to enter from an approximate parcel layer. |
Observe banks, substrate, woody material, vegetation, and cover separately
Habitat complexity is assembled from multiple visible and probed features; preserve each component before deriving a combined score.
For banks and erosion, record slope method, toe and top, material, vegetation, roots, armoring, undercut, exposed soil, scarps, slumps, rills, gullies, wave cut, ice effects, trampling, bank retreat evidence, sediment deposits, turbid plumes, and observation confidence. Separate active evidence from old or stabilized forms and distinguish shoreline erosion from upland, road, tributary, or construction sediment. A single visual assessment generally cannot establish rate or cause.
For shoreline and littoral substrate, use the approved particle and material classes and viewing or probing procedure. Record water depth, visibility, number or distribution of probes when controlled, dominant and secondary material, embeddedness or organic cover if defined, and when plants, woody debris, structures, or turbidity obscure the bottom. Do not convert a felt or visual class into a laboratory gradation.
For woody habitat, record the project's qualifying definition, item or cluster ID, position, water depth, connection to shore, stability, length and diameter method, branching or rootwad structure, decay, overhead or submerged status, and visibility. For vegetation and fish-cover features, keep overhanging vegetation, live inundated trees, brush, snags, macrophytes, boulders, ledges, undercut banks, and artificial structures as distinct observations before any method-defined composite.
- Bank form, modification, vegetation, erosion indicators, deposition, and confidence are separate fields.
- Observed activity or apparent age is distinguished from measured retreat rate and causal attribution.
- Shoreline and littoral substrates retain method, classes, depth, visibility, probes, and obscured-bottom status.
- Woody items retain qualifying definition, dimensions or class, position, depth, connection, stability, branching, and detection condition.
- Macrophytes, overhang, brush, snags, live trees, boulders, ledges, undercut banks, and human structures remain separate before aggregation.
Connect the shoreline strip to bathymetry, light, hydrology, and passage
Nearshore habitat changes with basin shape, water level, light, exposure, and connection to wetlands, tributaries, floodplains, and the main lake.
Link each reach to versioned bathymetry and stage-corrected depth where available. Preserve bottom slope, shelf width, abrupt drop-offs, coves, points, fetch or exposure direction, and uncertainty. A fixed horizontal distance from shore can cross very different depths and substrates. Maximum depth, one sounding, or a generalized shoreline cannot define the usable littoral area.
Treat ecological littoral extent as a site- and time-dependent interaction among bottom depth and slope, substrate, water clarity and light penetration, macrophytes, water level, and disturbance. Record Secchi or light data only under its own method and time; do not turn one clarity reading into a fixed rooting depth or habitat boundary. Couple plant mapping through the dedicated aquatic-vegetation method when species or bed extent matters.
Map tributaries, outlets, springs when known, wetlands, floodplain and side-channel connections, culverts, perched crossings, dams, causeways, drawdown barriers, seasonal isolation, and navigation structures. Record observed flow, inundation, passability clues, and timing. A map intersection or visual obstruction is screening evidence, not a fish-passage determination or authorization to alter a structure.
| Context | Evidence | Bounded interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Depth and slope | Stage-corrected soundings or bathymetry, datum, survey date, vertical and horizontal uncertainty. | Defines surveyed geometry, not habitat quality by itself. |
| Light and clarity | Method, location, time, weather, depth, Secchi or irradiance evidence, and season. | Supports light context; does not impose a universal littoral or plant-depth boundary. |
| Exposure | Fetch direction, wind and wave observations, orientation, boat wake and ice context, and shoreline form. | Potential energy context, not an erosion rate or design load without analysis. |
| Hydrologic connection | Mapped feature, observed water level and flow, structure geometry, season, and field verification. | Potential pathway or barrier; fish passage and jurisdiction require dedicated assessment. |
Describe potential fish-habitat features without diagnosing fish populations
Physical cover observations can characterize available structure, but fish presence, use, recruitment, limitation, and management response require fisheries-specific evidence.
Use the controlled habitat categories in the project method: submerged and overhanging vegetation, brush, large wood and rootwads, live inundated trees, undercut banks, boulders, ledges, substrate, depth, shade, wetlands, tributary connections, and human structures. Record feature extent and diversity within the defined plot and water-level context. The phrase fish cover means a potential concealment or structural feature under that method; it does not prove fish used it.
Do not infer species identity, abundance, age structure, spawning, nursery use, recruitment, carrying capacity, population trend, limiting factor, or stocking need from habitat observation alone. Those conclusions may require seasonal fish sampling, gear-efficiency analysis, movement or spawning evidence, water temperature and dissolved oxygen, prey and vegetation context, hydrology, harvest, genetics, disease, and comparison across suitable habitats.
Consult the responsible state, Tribal, federal, or reservoir fisheries authority before labeling critical, spawning, nursery, essential, or protected habitat. USFWS IPaC and NOAA Essential Fish Habitat resources can screen federal trust resources and mapped designations where applicable, but current agency consultation and field verification control. Inland lakes may fall outside NOAA's EFH framework while still having state, Tribal, or USFWS protections.
- Physical feature, extent method, depth, stage, season, visibility, and survey unit are explicit.
- Potential cover is not reported as observed occupancy or population benefit.
- Species, life stage, spawning, nursery, passage, limiting-factor, and stocking claims are withheld unless supported by dedicated evidence.
- Applicable Tribal, state, USFWS, NOAA, reservoir, or other authority and current protected-resource layers are identified.
- Field observations, mapped designation, consultation outcome, and management decision remain separate records.
Preserve photo, GPS, GIS, and remote evidence as a traceable observation system
A derived shoreline map should remain reproducible from original images, tracks, field units, classifications, edits, and exclusions.
For each field photograph, retain original file and metadata, photo ID, reach or plot ID, camera position and coordinate system, target location, direction or bearing, time and UTC offset, platform offset, focal length or zoom state when available, water level, weather, lighting, obstruction, photographer, and privacy or sensitivity status. Use a repeat-photo protocol when trend is intended. A camera GPS normally locates the camera, not every feature in the image.
For aerial, satellite, lidar, sonar, parcel, hydrography, wetland, bathymetric, shoreline, and land-cover layers, retain provider, title, acquisition and publication dates, coordinate reference system, resolution or scale, processing level, license, known accuracy, classification, and intended use. Distinguish surveyed boundaries from interpreted or digitized features and field-verify at the scale of the decision.
Keep raw points, tracks, photos, imagery, and field forms immutable. Derived reaches, polygons, classifications, and metrics need versioned code or edit history, topology and attribute checks, reviewer, source links, uncertainty, excluded areas, and release state. Protect home interiors, people, culturally sensitive resources, rare-species locations, archaeological sites, sacred sites, and security-sensitive infrastructure from unnecessary collection and disclosure.
| Stage | Retain | Release boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Raw capture | Original photos and EXIF, GNSS files, vessel tracks, field forms, notes, soundings, imagery, and provider metadata. | Restrict sensitive coordinates, personal information, property views, and licensed imagery as required. |
| Controlled processing | Coordinate transforms, clock corrections, georeferencing, digitizing, classification, scripts, software versions, manual edits, and exclusions. | Do not replace raw files or hide subjective interpretation. |
| Derived product | Feature IDs, source links, unit geometry, metrics, confidence, uncertainty, QA findings, reviewer, and version. | A clean map does not remove positional, temporal, visibility, or classification limits. |
| Public release | Approved generalization, redaction, attribution, license, accessibility, limitations, and release authority. | Public transparency does not require exposing protected or culturally sensitive locations. |
Prove repeatability before comparing condition
Observer calibration, field checks, reproducible calculations, and an applicable reference framework must precede trend or condition claims.
Train the whole crew on zone boundaries, unit geometry, feature definitions, cover or extent categories, distance and dimension estimation, substrate observation, woody-material qualification, erosion evidence, photo framing, non-detection codes, permissions, and safety. Conduct a calibration reach in which observers independently score the same features, compare results, resolve definitions, and retain the proficiency record. Repeat calibration when observers, methods, visibility, water level, or equipment change.
Use project-defined repeat units, independent or paired observations, measured distance checks, GPS checks, depth checks, photo review, field-form completeness checks, range and logic rules, and map topology and attribute checks. Preserve both original estimates and authorized corrections. Consensus in the boat can improve completeness but is not an independent duplicate unless the design preserves independent observations first.
Calculate metrics only from versioned eligible fields, denominators, weights, category scores, missing-data rules, and code. Then select an applicable reference comparison by region, lake type, hydrologic setting, shoreline class, and intended use. EPA's NLA condition estimates are developed for population-scale assessment with regional reference logic; do not transplant national or regional breakpoints into a local permit, parcel, impairment, or project trigger without program authority and validation.
Calibrate observers
Practice zone layout, distances, cover or extent, substrate, woody features, erosion indicators, photos, and unit-status codes against controlled examples.
Check field repeatability
Use approved duplicate or repeat units and independent observations to estimate disagreement and trigger retraining or qualification.
Reproduce metrics
Version input eligibility, denominators, weights, formulas, category mappings, missingness, scripts, and output checks.
Apply the right reference
Document reference population, lake type, region, vintage, uncertainty, comparability, and authority before assigning a condition class.
Resolve access, consultation, and sensitive-resource controls before fieldwork
Public water access, property ownership, Tribal sovereignty, scientific permits, protected species, cultural resources, and data sensitivity are separate authorities.
Create a permission matrix for launch and vessel access, entry onto public or private land, bank measurements, flagging or markers, photography, drones, collection, probing or disturbance, protected areas, park or refuge work, research permits, and data publication. Record the issuing authority, exact activity and footprint, personnel, dates, conditions, required notifications, deliverables, and revocation or stop-work contact. Observation from water does not grant upland entry or material collection.
Engage the relevant Tribal government or designated cultural and natural-resource office early when work may affect Tribal lands, waters, treaty or similar rights, cultural resources, culturally important species, sacred places, or sensitive knowledge. Government-to-government consultation is conducted by the responsible government authority; a contractor or lake group should not claim to have completed consultation merely by notifying an individual. Follow Tribal direction for access, sampling, photography, data ownership, review, storage, and release.
Screen current USFWS trust resources and, where applicable, NOAA Essential Fish Habitat and other federal, state, Tribal, local, park, reservoir, wetland, archaeological, and conservation layers. Treat online maps as screening tools with dates and limitations, then obtain the required official lists, consultation, or permits. Separate protected-resource potential, field observation, expert confirmation, agency finding, and authorization.
- Water, launch, land, photography, drone, collection, disturbance, marking, and publication permissions are resolved separately.
- Tribal government contacts, consultation authority, treaty or similar rights, culturally important resources, and data protocols are addressed early.
- USFWS, NOAA where applicable, state, Tribal, local, park, reservoir, wetland, and cultural-resource screening is current and versioned.
- Sensitive locations and attributes have collection-minimization, access-control, retention, review, redaction, and release rules.
- Permit and consultation conditions are in the field packet and linked to unit-level stop-work rules.
Make safety and raw-evidence closeout part of the method
The survey is incomplete until the crew is safely off the water, access and sensitive-data conditions are met, and every planned unit and raw file is reconciled.
Use the approved site- and task-specific safety plan for boat and launch condition, crew competence, flotation and communications, weather and lightning, traffic and wakes, cold and heat, wading, unstable or undercut banks, mud, steep slopes, deep water, current, ice, low visibility, woody snags, ropes and anchors, vegetation entanglement, wildlife, sharp debris, contaminated sediment, and lifting. Recheck conditions at each reach because a calm launch does not establish a safe exposed shore.
Do not use shore ice or lake ice as a survey platform without a separately approved ice-work plan, trained personnel, current local assessment, rescue capability, and responsible authorization. Do not wade merely to complete a field; record the observation as method-limited. Keep the boat, propeller, anchor and loose lines clear of woody cover and vegetation; do not enter an undercut bank or unstable bluff toe.
Harmful algal blooms and unknown contamination can create ingestion, skin, inhalation, and aerosol exposure. Follow the responsible health and safety authority's controls, and avoid generating spray or contacting scum. A photo or habitat value never justifies exposure beyond crew training and PPE. Record the affected unit and safe observations without assigning a habitat zero.
At closeout, reconcile planned, completed, partial, method-limited, inaccessible, and unsafe units; forms; observers; photos; GPS and tracks; stage and datum; soundings; protected-resource notes; permissions; QA checks; incidents; equipment; and pending reviews. Preserve raw files before transformation, quarantine identity or coordinate conflicts, create attributable corrections, and hand the package to the named GIS, QA, regulatory, and management reviewers. Do not publish an attractive map while source or sensitivity review is incomplete.
Run the go or no-go check
Confirm permissions, weather, access, vessel and wading conditions, HAB or contamination, ice, snags, traffic, communications, rescue, and crew authority at the launch and each changed reach.
Stop without fabricating a zero
Retain the planned unit and actual safe location, code the hazard or limitation, record valid partial observations, and notify the field lead.
Reconcile the survey inventory
Account for every unit, form, photo, track, observation, QA check, permission condition, sensitive item, incident, and pending determination.
Freeze the raw package
Archive originals and checksums or controlled identifiers, then version corrections, processing, derived metrics, maps, review, redaction, and release.
Sources and review notes
Educational field-assessment and evidence guidance only. This guide does not approve a survey frame, shoreline or littoral boundary, ordinary or normal high-water determination, buffer or setback, condition score, erosion threshold, habitat target, impairment finding, cause, restoration priority, protected-resource conclusion, stocking recommendation, permit, treatment trigger, design, construction, or management action. The current project plan, jurisdiction, landowner, Tribal government, approved field method, reference framework, safety plan, and responsible authorities govern. Shoreline, riparian, bank, drawdown, and littoral definitions differ by program and water level. Observation must remain separate from condition interpretation, regulatory status, causal attribution, eligibility, authorization, implementation, and effectiveness.
- National Lakes Assessment 2022 Field Operations ManualU.S. Environmental Protection Agency · field protocol
- National Lakes Assessment 2022 Technical Support DocumentU.S. Environmental Protection Agency · agency guidance
- National Lakes Assessment 2022 Quality Assurance Project PlanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency · agency guidance
- Quality Assurance Project Plan StandardU.S. Environmental Protection Agency · agency guidance
- Lakes and Reservoirs, Guidelines for Study Design and SamplingU.S. Geological Survey · reference
- National Field Manual, Chapter A1: Preparations for Water SamplingU.S. Geological Survey · field protocol
- Bathymetric SurveysU.S. Geological Survey · reference
- Lake Shoreland and Shallows Habitat Monitoring Field ProtocolWisconsin Department of Natural Resources · field protocol
- Minnesota Lake Plant Survey Manual, Version 4Minnesota Department of Natural Resources · field protocol
- Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York StateNew York State Department of Environmental Conservation · field protocol
- Information for Planning and ConsultationU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · agency guidance
- Essential Fish HabitatNOAA Fisheries · agency guidance
- Consultation with TribesU.S. Environmental Protection Agency · agency guidance
- General Conditions for Scientific Research and Collecting PermitsU.S. National Park Service · agency guidance
- How People and Animals Are Exposed to HABs and Their ToxinsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency · agency guidance